Bankruptcy Reform: Fighting the Uphill Battle
Whoever said change is good was not referring to recent bankruptcy reform. On October 17, 2005, Congress instituted federal bankruptcy changes that were supposed to eliminate the "deadbeats" filing bankruptcy. The changes were designed to make it more difficult for those consumers trying to run from debt through bankruptcy.
Under the changes, the new first step is to undergo credit counseling. The counseling step is designed to analyze debt to income ratio and the ability to pay debt. The system is designed to determine which people could be steered into a debt management plan and away from bankruptcy. Moreover, this step is designed to deter abuse of the bankruptcy system. However, a study by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA) concluded that 97 percent of consumers were unable to repay any debt. More surprisingly, 79 percent of consumers were put into "dire financial straits by circumstances beyond their control, such as the loss of a job, catastrophic medical expenses or the death of a spouse."
Once a consumer concludes credit counseling, consumers face even more hurdles in determining which specific chapter to file. The two types of consumer bankruptcy chapters are 7 and 13. Chapter 7 provides the debtor a discharge of his or her debts via a liquidation of assets. In Chapter 13, the debtor receives a discharge through payment into a reorganization plan. Here, the debtor pays a monthly amount into a plan that cures overdue debts. In the past, Chapter 13 was not widely used as Chapter 7 provided a discharge without any obligation to pay debt. In addition, most people protected their most prized possessions through federal or state bankruptcy exemptions.
However, new hurdles like the "means" test has affected the eligibility of many would-be Chapter 7 filers. Now after the reform, debtors must pass what is known as the "means" test in order to file Chapter 7. A debtor is forced into Chapter 13 when he or she fails the "means test." The "means" test states that if the prospective filer's current monthly income (CMI) multiplied by 12 exceeds the median income for a family of the same size in the same state, then the debtor is forced to file Chapter 13 bankruptcy. This provision was designed to limit the number of people abusing the system. In reality, it creates a presumption of abuse. As a result, consumers are now given limited freedom in choosing which bankruptcy chapter to file.
The legislature did not leave out Chapter 13 in terms of change. It also endured an overhaul. For instance, the length of repayment plans is now five years. Also, unsecured creditors are now treated more favorably under bankruptcy laws. As such, Chapter 13 plans will not be approved if they provide less to unsecured creditors than if the debtor liquidated his or her assets in Chapter 7. As a result, some consumers might not be able to file bankruptcy at all.
Continue reading "Bankruptcy Reform: Fighting the Uphill Battle" »
